HSUS asks Administration for a Wiser Home on the Range for Wild Horses

a letter from Wayne Pacelle, President and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States

Victims of recent BLM Pryor Mt. Roundup - Photo by Terry Fitch

It’s never enough to pass a law. The agency assigned to enforce the law must work to implement it properly. And for a classic case example of how poor implementation can undermine the original intent of legislation, look no further than the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and its efforts to protect wild horses and burros under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act.

Enacted by Congress in 1971, and then amended several times, the purpose of the Act has always been to protect free-roaming herds of wild horses and burros in the West, for their well-being and as living emblems of the western American experience. Yet, despite the intent of Congress, the BLM has shrunk the range of the horses by nearly 20 million acres, rounded up and removed tens of thousands of them, moved them into captive holding facilities, and used its federal appropriations to hold and feed the horses. Through the years, it has also stood by as many of the “adopters” of the horses sent them to slaughter plants for human consumption.

The Obama Administration has said it will resist any effort to allow slaughter—and that is a welcome development. The administration has also pledged to step up the use of contraception—an innovative vaccine and delivery system that The HSUS has long advocated and helped to develop years ago, but that prior Administrations treated as an experimental novelty, not as a practical management tool. And it’s tried to invigorate the adoption program, in order to shrink the captive population and the financial burdens that imposes, and talked about setting up horse sanctuaries in the East, with richer grass, that can sustain horses economically and provide a long-term, comfortable and safe setting for them.

All of that sounds great, and for those elements of the program, we at The HSUS are on board. But the massive roundups and removals of horses must be curtailed. This Administration does not appear prepared to do that—and we are seeing a pattern of behavior similar to prior Administrations. The BLM is on track to round up and remove 12,000 horses next year, and that will inflate the captive population to more than 40,000—well beyond the number of horses on the range. And it will add an incredible 25 percent to the number of horses cared for in holding, which the BLM itself has been warning is taking the program to its breaking point.

I wrote a detailed letter today to Secretary Salazar and told him that this pace of roundups, including a planned roundup of horses at the Calico Complex in Nevada, cannot continue. It is bad for horses and burros, and it is fiscally reckless, with 75 percent of the entire funding for the program going to the care of captive horses. The upward spiral of spending on captive horse management must be turned around, and the only way to do it is to severely restrict the roundups and removals.

The original Act never contemplated 40,000 captive wild horses and the use of funds to care for them. If you look at just spending priorities, it’s become the Captive Horses and Burros Act, yet the original intent of the Act was to keep wild horses on the range and humanely manage their populations. The BLM can do so with the widespread use of contraception, manipulating the sex ratios of herds, and, where possible, expanding the range lands back to their original size.

While in this crisis, roundups and removals should only occur when the welfare of the horses is in immediate jeopardy or when there is a severe ecological problem. And the removals should be carefully monitored to be limited to probable adoption opportunities, at least until the numbers in the long-term holding facilities are significantly reduced. If necessary, the BLM, and the taxpayer, would be better served by providing short-term “sanctuary on the range” programs that provide supplemental feed and water to herds in the wild, until the contraception program can stabilize or shrink the population. The on-the-range management tools should be used to keep their numbers in check, but most importantly to keep them on the range, and reverse the fiscal and animal care disaster that the current treadmill has created.

Bookmark and Share

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

7 comments on “HSUS asks Administration for a Wiser Home on the Range for Wild Horses

  1. About time we heard from HSUS! It is good to know that they see the reality of this situation even if many of us do not agree on management. This is a long looked for response. I hope it will add to the strength those who are working hard to stop the Calico roundup and keep our wild ones safe in a new and safe future. Our wild horses and burros DO Belong ON the Range

    Like

  2. R.T.- I agree, baby steps. Its not everything the horses need, but we have to take what we can get. FOR NOW. I like the idea of the “range sanctuaries”. Are there groups out west who can or will help “install” new “watering holes”? If the 20 million acres was restored for the Mustangs, would it be enough to permanently stop unnecessary round-ups? Or let the healthy horses in holding back out on the range? Do you think the captives would go “wild” again? I appreciate your expertise on the horses. Thank you SO much for your voice!-Kathy

    Like

  3. well, at least HSUS has finally done something by calling for a moratorium on the wild horse & burro roundups.
    does anyone know what the “new economic model for wild horse management that HSUS has developed” (as stated in wayne’s letter to salaCZAR) looks like? were any of the whb advocacy organizations or wildlife ecologists part of this “state of the art model” that he talks about? i, for one, would be curious to learn more about this plan of which he speaks!

    Like

  4. FINALLY! I have always supported the HSUS. Their advocacy and major changes for ALL animals has been top-notch. However, since Sept. 09 & the Cloud round-up, I have had mixed feelings.

    For 3 months we have been calling, faxing, writing, trying to get the BLM to be put on hold…a moratorium. For all this time, no one responded. Not even the HSUS. I was shocked. With their power, large financial base, superb *lawyers, I fully expected some action with positive results.

    ****But nothing from the HSUS except they have a wild horse contraceptive arrangement with the BLM!

    I know many others like myself have let the HSUS know how we felt about the HSUS’s absolute silence on the BLM’s round-up frenzy. And with so many horse/foals injuries, deaths. This IS also animal cruelty, abuse. Hello, HSUS.

    Now the HSUS finally is coming forward. This is a very good thing. But I read it as trying to sit on both sides of the fence.

    Thankfully they are calling for a restriction on the BLM round-ups, but NOT a moratorium. This article also has Wayne Pacelle stating the HSUS is still thinking of supporting Salazar’s sanctuaries and also that the wild horses deserve to run free and also “temporary” sanctuaries. And in this article, the HSUS also supports the “Wild Free Roaming Horses & Burros Act, 1971.”

    Never-the-less, the HSUS finally heard the negative feedback and is responding, more-or-less, for the freedom of the wild horses and burros on the range. And I say, trying to cover all bases.

    I am encouraged that the HSUS has finally responded. Now for HSUS action.

    Thank You.

    Like

  5. I’ve posted this before, but this seems like a most appropriate place to bring it up again before the HSUS. When visiting the holding pens after the Pryor roundup in September with folks who were interested in adopting one of the horses, a BLM employee proudly explained to us that they had given enough PZP to the young mares that were captured and then released that they would never get pregnant. Having foals out of season is one thing, but causing permanent hormone alteration resulting in mare’s sterilization wasn’t in the BLM’s game plan, was it? Or maybe it was.

    Like

Care to make a comment?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s