Horse News

NEVADA RANCHERS SUFFER FROM SELF-DELUDED DROUGHT DENIAL

Press Release from Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

“The Blogosphere is still roiling over the New York Time’s article, written by Dave Philipps, dissing wild equines and cozening up to federally subsidized welfare ranchers who feel they are ‘entitled’ to turn a profit with their private cows on your public lands. I penned my thoughts on the subject, yesterday, and strongly encourage you to contact the Senior Editor at the NYTs and share your disdain by writing to senioreditor@nytimes.com

But we are NOT off the subject of whining welfare ranchers yet as we would like to share a Press Release from PEER.org that puts into the perspective the ranchers riding across the country to make their point that they have a right to destroy your public lands and to take the wild equines down with it all.  They feel they are above the law and unethical does not even begin to describe their ways.  Thanks to PEER for keeping the heat on this spoiled adult brats!!!  It’s a rare day, indeed, when you see me on the same side of the fence with a BLM Manager but in this case, I agree wholeheartedly, read on and see why.  Keep the faith, my friends.” ~ R.T.


Photo: WWP. Grazing damage on the Argenta allotment, July 2014.

Washington, DC — A U.S. Bureau of Land Management District Manager from Nevada targeted by angry Nevada ranchers was more than justified in removing cattle from drought-stricken public rangeland, according to data released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Tomorrow, protesting ranchers start a “Cowboy Express” ride to Washington demanding removal of BLM Battle Mountain District Manager Douglas Furtado as an “abusive federal employee” even as conservation groups urge that Furtado be commended not condemned for his actions.

Like much of the West, Nevada has been in the grips of persistent drought, with nearly 90% of the state under “severe to exceptional” drought for three consecutive years. This, in turn, causes greater conflict over dwindling water and forage. Not surprisingly, Nevada has also become Ground Zero for rising tensions on range management as illustrated by this spring’s armed standoff with renegade rancher Cliven Bundy who has been illegally grazing his cattle in southern Nevada for more than a decade.

“We all know about climate deniers, but this is the first we’ve heard of drought deniers,” stated PEER Advocacy Director Kirsten Stade, pointing out that much of Furtado’s Battle Mountain District has been among the hardest hit by drought in Nevada. “If we are to believe the ranchers, an extreme, multiyear, regionwide drought has magically spared only their allotments.”

In July, Battle Mountain District Manager Furtado ordered livestock removed from parched range on the sprawling 332,000-acre Argenta allotment in northern Nevada after conditions fell below thresholds that ranchers and BLM had previously agreed would trigger removal. The ranchers contend that Furtado’s actions were arbitrary but an analysis of Geographic Information Systems and BLM data reveal range in terrible ecological shape:

  • Nearly every Battle Mountain allotment evaluated failed range health standards for wildlife and water quality, largely due to livestock grazing;
  • Half of the Argenta Allotment, and roughly 30% of the Battle Mountain District is habitat for sage grouse, a species being reviewed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. BLM has been directed to protect the species’ habitat but 90% of assessed sage grouse habitat was in Battle Mountain allotments failing standards due to livestock; and
  • Fence line contrasts visible in satellite imagery show that public lands in the checkerboarded allotment are far more heavily grazed than private lands, suggesting that ranchers are more protective of their own lands than they are of publicly-owned range.

“Doug Furtado should be praised, not pilloried, for doing his job,” Stade added, noting a letter of support sent today from PEER and Western Watersheds Project urging that BLM as an agency to do more to stand up for its employees when they attempt to protect public resources. “The Cowboy Express is actually a cynical attempt to use iconic imagery to mask selfish abuse of public lands. If ranchers will not be responsible stewards then conscientious land managers have to make hard decisions, as Doug Furtado has done.”

Western Watersheds Project intervened in the Argenta case when ranchers initially refused to remove their cattle despite their previous agreement. Even after an order from an Interior Department administrative law judge affirmed the BLM’s authority to remove the livestock, as many as 100 cattle remain on the Argenta allotment to this day.

“The rancher resistance to drought protections in Battle Mountain is aimed at preventing effective protection of public lands and sage-grouse habitats across the West,” said Katie Fite, Western Watersheds Project’s Biodiversity Director. “It is meant to intimidate other federal agency managers so that they turn a blind eye to habitat degradation.”

The records for all roughly 20,000 BLM allotments across the West, many of which show similar overgrazed conditions, will be displayed next month in a new PEER website documenting longstanding and serious ecological impacts caused by ongoing livestock overgrazing.

18 replies »

  1. There is a crack in the BLM shell. Let us all pour our passion into that crack. If the
    Cowboy Express is going to DC who are they going to ask for “compassion”? I would like to contact the committee or whomever they think will help them asap.

    Like

  2. These so-called “cowboys” need to drive their cattle in front of them on their way east. Problem is they would have to pay for decent land and taxes to run their cows. Interesting that Nevada is way down the list in cattle production–my state of Pennsylvania has more cattle than does Nevada. Here’s some interesting data–http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-graphs/all-cattle-numbers.html

    Like

    • Also, can anyone verify if there are or aren’t any wild horses on this allotment? I’d like to use this example for a report.

      Like

  3. A quick look at the Argenta grazing allotment:
    Per BLM RAS, it appears there are no Herd Management Areas within the Argenta grazing allotment BUT it appears that about half the allotment includes the NORTH SHOSHONE Herd Area NV0697; therefore did have wild horses/burros at one time and was originally designated as legal wild horse/burro land.
    North Shoshone HA Public Acres under BLM management – 102,888 (about 400-500 wild horses/burros)
    North Shoshone HA Other Acres – 72,247

    Argenta grazing allotment # 20001
    Total Argenta grazing allotment AUMs – 17,590
    Using the approximate cost of $25 per head per month cost to lease private land for grazing; this would cost the Argenta grazing permitees about $439,750 dollars annually vs the BLM welfare ranching cost of $1.35 per head (AUM) per month which would only cost the ranchers about $23,746. This leaves us to question the often stated “We only care about the health of the land” by the ranchers when we can easily see that the truth is they only care about the MONEY.

    Side note: 17,590 AUMs could support about 1,466 wild horses and burros

    Like

    • GG, great sleuthing! I wonder how long horses have been out of there entirely? It seems the horrendous conditions are a result of cattle only, and all that oversight which supposedly is intended to maintain a healthy range. What would be left if the legislation pending now which would double the lease term was approved?

      Like

  4. Ranchers WHO by the way LIVE off the Government should be called SNAP/Link card holders….why? Because their cattle are fed government grass and givin government housing and are providing them with welfare subsidized ranching checks when they sell to slaughter. Whats the difference between them and snap food recipients? The Snap food recipients dont own the cattle before its butchered.

    Like

  5. I’m no fan of BLM, but I have to give the Battle Mountain District it’s props; it’s one of the only field offices I know of that visually documents range conditions. So when this office says a thing is so, they can pretty much back it up.

    Funny how the office is held in high regard by allotment holders until it tries to uphold the rules. I was also under the impression that when a grazing lease is adopted, the lease holder agrees to those rules in order to run his animals on crappy land at below-clearance prices.

    There is no honor in an act of rebellion where the rebellious already have the upper hand. It doesn’t make them look heroic. It furthers the belief that they are selfish, greedy children who expect their efforts to be praised beyond what’s merited:

    We’re cattle ranchers! (grazing on borrowed land, drinking borrowed water.)
    We’ve had to do without! (so has everybody else. But you’ll get a check next year from the Federal government for your ‘inconveniences’.)
    We have the right! (no. ya don’t. you’re a renter, not the owner.)
    We want Justice!

    So do we. So man up and take responsibility for your animals and your actions. The ranges are a finite resource. Try and think of the future consequences when your inability to be a decent steward of those lands you borrow now results in lands that won’t ever be useful again. Because that day is coming.

    Like

  6. this march of the welfare cattlemen should be called “The Grass Food Stamp March”…These men admit to feeding out their cattle on public land, while raising hay to sell off their own land…. They are double dipping… They are experiencing an advantage over other ranchers who have to own their own land and feed cows accordingly…. These welfare ranchers are ungrateful, arrogant, and should lose their right to feed cattle on public land…. They represent only 2%-4% of beef raised in the United States.. Getting rid of them will not raise the cost of beef.

    Like

Care to make a comment?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.