Horse News

BLM Rescinds Permit for Deadly Wolf Derby

“Good news for the Wild Horses & Burros on two counts:

  1. Leaving predators on public lands may FINALLY allow mother nature to manage wildlife correctly as she has since the beginning of time.
  2. Hope that public pressure/opinion truly can have an impact on the BLM and the means in which they mismanage public lands…keep the faith!” ~ R.T.

Defenders of the predator’s introduction decry what they call Idaho’s “War on Wolves.”

TWIN FALLS • The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has withdrawn its permit to allow a wolf and coyote derby on public land near Salmon.

Seven groups had been suing to stop the derby planned by the hunter rights group Idaho for Wildlife to hold on public land in January.

The lawsuits and pile of public comments in opposition to the derby likely led to the BLM’s decision, Defenders of Wildlife spokesman Shawn Cantrell said Tuesday.

“I think one can infer some combination of those two led to the decision,” he said. “We’re obviously very pleased that they have.”

The BLM had approved the five-year permit a couple of weeks ago, saying no significant environmental impact from the derby was apparent.

Now the derby will be held on private land, as it was last year, said Idaho for Wildlife spokesman Steve Alde. The BLM permit would have roughly doubled the land available by providing access to federal land.

“The BLM at the D.C. level has become too politically influenced and motivated,” Alde said, as requiring an extensive environmental review “for only 100 to 150 hunters to cover over 3 million acres is absurd and ridiculous.”

The first derby in December 2013 drew about 100 hunters and negative media attention from outside Idaho. The news website Vice ran a lengthy article by someone who went undercover to participate.

Last year, 21 coyotes were killed but no wolves. The wolves were the focus, though, of derby supporters and opponents.

Wolves were largely eradicated decades ago, but they have been a controversial issue in Idaho and elsewhere in the West since their reintroduction in the 1990s, often pitting environmentalists against ranchers, hunters and others who didn’t want to see wolves return.

Defenders of the predator’s introduction decry what they call Idaho’s “War on Wolves.”

Wolf hunting started in Idaho in 2008. The political argument since has been how much hunting to allow and how much state money to spend controlling the wolf population.

The Republican-dominated Legislature, with Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter’s strong support, created a Wolf Depredation Control Board earlier this year to oversee the killing of problem wolves.

daho Democrats tend to favor killing fewer wolves and spending less money to do it. Environmental groups in Blaine County, one of Idaho’s few blue bastions, have been leading the way, working with local sheepherders on non-lethal wolf-control methods.

The green groups that were suing cheered the BLM’s decision, saying the derby undercut the wolf population’s recovery.

“The public spoke loud and clear against this wildlife killing competition, and we are glad to see senior officials at the Department of the Interior ultimately respond to the public’s opposition by directing that the permit be withdrawn,” said Suzanne Stone, of Defenders, in a news release. “By denying the permit, BLM is supporting sound wildlife management practices as opposed to endorsing archaic killing competitions on our public lands that Americans so clearly oppose.”

“We’re so glad that the deadly derby has been canceled this year,” said Amy Atwood, senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “These sort of ruthless kill-fests have no place in this century. We intend to pursue every available remedy to stop these horrible contests.”

Alder said derby participants will have to sign a waiver saying any animals taken on public land won’t qualify for the derby. Idaho for Wildlife started the application process early, as BLM advised, he said.

He blamed the BLM’s D.C. office for revoking the permit and said his group will “push for more legislative oversight of this out-of-control agency that is now caving to the radical anti-hunters.”

Alder said the group again will offer two cash prizes. Excess money will be given to charities, including to support a rancher who, Alder wrote, lost most of his calves and 13 adult cows to wolves over the summer and may have to get a job at ShopKo to make ends meet.

The derby will be held Jan. 2 to 4.

16 replies »

    • Yes, I support Defenders of Wildlife and Center for Biological Diversity because of the wolves, but hate that neither believes Wild Horses are native. I have written them several times and sent them evidence, but they stay steadfastly against the nativity of WH&Bs. It is a paradox!

      Thank Heavens for In Defense of Wildlife and HSUS among others.

      Like

  1. Barbara, yes I am with you on this, why do other orgs. seem to get what they go after ??? and our innocent beauties cant catch a break ????????????????????????? We got to make some changes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like

  2. The BLM had better have observers out there to keep any thought of killing animals on public property out of those pitiful excuses for humankind little minds. As for the rancher who “lost” his cattle to wolves – well, what did you expect? Maybe a little realism will be good for these pantywaists who are in a business living off the land but draw the line at actually dealong with it and have thought for years they could kill their way out of problems – and finally being told NO.

    Like

  3. Come on – THIRTEEN adult cows & most of his calves???????????? Where were they for petes sake? If he lost one – seems he would take steps to protect them better and in the summer – when there would have been plenty of wildlife for the wolves to eat? He doesn’t sound like a very capable rancher – maybe Shopko is a better place for him. This sounds a bit far-fetched to me. Am I wrong?

    Like

    • I had seen this before – and certainly tells us something – when BBC produced it – and nothing much said here in the US! But then it seems to be only Europe is interested in the whole re-wilding concept. Here in the US we just want to get rid of all predators! Well that’s what happened in the 1920s – look where THAT got us.

      Like

      • We are behind the whole world in everything. GMOs and FRACKING are also excluded from many countries some of which are considered third world. But I do believe we are beginning to be heard and that is exciting – we might just catch up before long. After all our POTUS did just stand up to save the African elephants, rhinos, and other wildlife being poached to extinction. And Joe Biden does work closely with us and brought about the defunding of the USDA inspectors. Now if we can just get the borders closed and eventually a SAFE ACT passed.

        Like

  4. Wildlife-killing contests perpetuate a culture of violence and send the message to children that life has little value and that an entire species of animals is disposable.

    Like

    • GG – doesn’t it make you wonder what mentality motivates these contests? I cringe to think about these creeps. In South Korea the adults bring their kids to watch the torture, killing, and eating of dogs and cats. It is a freaked up world we live in.

      Like

Care to make a comment?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.