Horse News

The Ten Big Lies of Traditional Western Politics

as published on CounterPunch.org

Public lands managed by the federal government loom large in western politics, a defining topic dictating the political debate…

Corporate interests – logging, grazing, and mineral extraction most prominently – have often succeeded in dominating that debate through their good-old-boy network of legislators, county commissioners, lobby groups, and captive agencies. This powerful group largely controls the imaginary “custom and culture” of the West, a myth which reflects an attitude of dominion over nature, an anti-regulation mindset, and an obsession with economic profit regardless of social or ecological consequences. But in reality, westerners in large numbers don’t actually share these values. With the influx of tech companies and professional workers from other regions, this extraction-centric worldview is becoming a tinier and tinier minority viewpoint in a West that increasingly prizes unspoiled scenery, abundant wildlife, and recreational values above extractive uses of public lands.

As they sense their deathgrip on the public debate slipping, those seeking to maximize exploitation and marginalize conservation on western public lands are becoming increasingly strident in their insistence on a variety of fictional assertions about the West. Here is a list of some of the most outrageous misinformation being peddled through the media and via political channels.

1) Industrial oil and gas drilling is compatible with healthy wildlife populations

Big Oil has been trying for decades to sell America on the idea that it is not a dirty industry, and that whatever its latest environmental disaster happened to be, it was a rare occurrence that will never happen again. Drilling rigs, pipelines, and the spiderweb of dusty access roads can exist side-by-side with abundant native wildlife, they assert. But we know better. An onslaught of scientific studies demonstrates conclusively that converting undeveloped habitats into industrial oil and gas fields decimates sage grouse and mule deer populations, interferes with pronghorn migrations, and harms native wildlife from the tiny sage sparrow to the majestic golden eagle. It no longer matters how many slick paid television ads show pumpjacks against the backdrop of purple mountains’ majesty, the public – from hunters to wildlife viewers to local westerners worried about their deteriorating quality of life – just aren’t buying it anymore. And this spatial incompatibility doesn’t even begin to address the broader problems of burning those fossil fuels and adding to climate change’s impacts on native wildlife species.

2) Nobody wants to see the sage grouse (or anything else) listed under the ESA

The Endangered Species Act is one of the nation’s most popular laws, enjoying 90% support from American voters, but that doesn’t seem to deter anti-environmental interests from claiming that nobody wants to see it used. Sen. Barrasso (R-WY) is currently pushing legislation to gut the ESA by turning over key decisions to states that don’t want the law enforced, while the Trump administration is trying to change the regulations to loosen protections for our rarest wildlife.

It just isn’t true that, “No one wants to see the sage grouse listed under the Endangered Species Act,” no matter how many politicians or bureaucrats say it. While it’s true that most sentient beings are opposed to extinction and don’t want to see species plummet to the level of ESA listing, the majority of westerners do want to see highly-imperiled species like sage-grouse gain federal protection under the law. A 2004 Central Colorado College survey found that on the conservative West Slope of Colorado, 68% thought the Gunnison sage grouse ought to be listed under the ESA. The Gunnison sage grouse was listed as a ‘threatened species’ in 2014, and a 2016 poll of West Slope voters found that 66% thought the bird should continue to be listed under the ESA until they are fully recovered. A 2014 poll commissioned by Defenders of Wildlife found that 67% of westerners supported listing the related greater sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act, including 57% in Wyoming, traditionally considered an anti-ESA state. So, when western good-old-boys say that nobody want to see endangered species listings, they’re speaking for themselves, not for westerners.

3) Logging, grazing, or fuelbreaks can stop big fires

This Big Lie started with Smokey the Bear and his Forest Service admonition, “Only YOU can prevent forest fires.” This myth, assuming all fires are human caused and unnatural, has been spreading from forests to deserts to grasslands ever since. The reality is that fire is often a natural event, and most western conifer forests naturally burn as hot, uncontrollable conflagrations every 200 to 700 years. Lodgepole pine – a colonizer forest type that the timber industry deliberately re-establishes for through clearcutting – is actually fire-dependent and burns even more frequently.

Out in the western deserts, overgrazing has created vast monocultures of cheatgrass, an invasive weed that destroys habitat values for wildlife and burns as often as every 5 years, and this is unnatural. In both forests and deserts, the really big fires happen during the driest, windiest weather, when wind can carry burning embers a quarter mile or more, and even interstate highways and the mighty Columbia River have been jumped by advancing flames. For both fires within their natural range of size and intensity, and those that are unnaturally large or frequent, it is foolish to think we can “control” them.

On arid rangelands, federal agencies and local conservation districts propose “greenstrips” a few hundred yards wide in the face of flying brands that carry for a quarter mile or more to start spot fires ahead of the flame front, in full knowledge that the “greenstrips” will be brown and combustible by the late-August peak of fire season. Federal and state agencies are fond of funneling millions in taxpayer dollars into fuel breaks in the backcountry despite science showing serious environmental impacts and a complete absence of reliable evidence that they work, for the political purpose of saying “we did all we could” and securing plausible deniability when uncontrolled fire inevitably burns into residential communities. The same is true for logging in forested backcountry – it just doesn’t work to stop or slow fires. Once a fire gets started and local topography and wind direction are understood, fuel breaks can be a very useful tactic. Instead of pretending they can control fire on the open range or in fire-adapted forests, officials would be better off focusing prevention efforts on defensible space immediately next to homes and communities, and educating the public on fire-wise methods to make homes as flame-resistant as possible.

4) Wild horses are the real threat to western rangeland health

Western public lands are so uniformly overgrazed that the degradation seems normal. The livestock industry likes to blame this abuse on wild horses. But in reality, most of the West has no wild horses at all. For example, only 12% of sage grouse habitats have any wild horses. Wild horses are a rare sight, so for the overwhelming majority of lands that are in poor condition, the domestic livestock are the cause when land health and wildlife suffer. Even where wild horses do occur, the impacts of horses are vastly outweighed by the damage caused by the domestic livestock that graze on public lands, which outnumber wild horses on the range by more than 36 to 1. Like any herbivore, wild horses can damage their habitats when overpopulated, but given the aggressive program of federal roundups, horses rarely reach these densities.

5) Ranchers are the real environmentalists

Ranchers vary in the degree to which they damage public lands and native ecosystems. The worst of the worst are fond of trumpeting the Big Lie that livestock are actually good for the environment. If the environmentalists would just leave ranchers alone, according to their logic, they would naturally do what is best for the lands and wildlife, forsaking their own profit motive. If ranchers were such great stewards, why are there so many endangered species on western public lands where cattle graze? Even the idea that ranchers protect open spaces is a myth: Virtually every rural subdivision ever built started with a rancher selling land to a developer. Yes, Virginia, there are real environmentalists: And they are not the commercial livestock operations pushing non-native invasive cattle and sheep into the remotest backcountry, but the nonprofit environmental professionals who enforce federal and state protections for lands and wildlife. These laws were written after over a century of abuse by the same industries and emerged in direct response to unmitigated disasters like the Dust Bowl and species extinction. Those who cannot learn from history….

6) Predators are killing our wild game (or our profits) and their numbers need to be “managed”

The eradication of native predators goes as far back as Manifest Destiny and the drive to tame the wilderness. The settlement of the West caused many species of native wildlife to become extinct, including big carnivores, as the West was domesticated into a landscape more suitable for “civilization.” Native wildlife incompatible with the livestock industry’s business model – from large predators that eat the occasional calf or sheep to prairie dogs, elk, and bison that compete with cattle for grass – were driven out. Today, large carnivores are making a comeback. They are territorial and occur at relatively sparse population levels, and there is little evidence that they limit or depress populations of elk and other hunted animals. Emerging science shows that the killing of predators in response to livestock losses may actually make those losses worse in the future. Today, more and more westerners are demanding healthy ecosystems in which native predators are a key component and in which ranchers are expected to coexist with native wildlife instead of wiping it out. The livestock industry’s war on native wildlife, led by the USDA’s cynically-named “Wildlife Services” (which killed 2.3 million animals last year, the majority of them native wildlife), is under increasing scrutiny, and the entire program is ripe for elimination.

7) When the next boom hits, the good times will return

Westerners have short memories when it comes to boom times. Oil and gas production runs in cycles of boom and bust driven by fluctuations in commodity prices. When prices are high, out-of-state corporations flood western states to make their millions, and then pull out when prices drop again. With booms come spectacular crime waves, social disruption, and financial stress as communities struggle to provide services and laborers to the temporarily ballooning population. As prices inevitably collapse, local governments are left holding the bag for pricey development projects, jobs disappear, young people emigrate, and whole towns dry up and blow away. This cycle of boom and bust has led economists to label western states as resource colonies, akin to developing nations that are stripped of their natural wealth to enrich a handful of billionaires in faraway cities. Where economic diversification takes root, communities thrive. Communities that stake their existence on the economic scourge of natural resource exploitation are doomed to die out.

8) Ranching is the cornerstone of western rural economies

Dating back to the 1800s, when big ranching operations were established by the second sons of British nobility who by law couldn’t inherit the family estate back home, the livestock industry has cultivated the self-serving mythos that it is the cornerstone of western economies. But if you run the numbers, you get a far different picture. University of Montana economist Thomas Powers did a West-wide assessment and found that the livestock industry accounted for only 0.1% of western economies. That’s not all that surprising when you consider that western state economies include metropolitan areas that are major engines of growth, including California’s Silicon Valley and its budding clones in other western states. Even in Wyoming, the least populated state in the West, all agriculture put together makes up only 1.5% of the gross domestic product, according to state statistics. Explorer John Wesley Powell called America west of the 100thmeridian “the Great American Desert,” and Powell had it right. Western mountains and basins are so arid and unproductive for cattle that only 1.9% of America’s beef ever sets foot on western public lands, despite the cowboy myth that pervades western culture. The biggest contributor to western local economies? Investment income, often from retirees, according to Headwaters Economics compilations of U.S. Census data.

9) The oil, timber, and livestock industries have the right to extract private profits from public lands

Back in the 1800s, the public domain was a free-for-all where anyone could mine, log, or graze their livestock on any lands they could control at the point of a gun. But local westerners grew frustrated with big corporations that logged off their mountains, grazed their basins down to dust, and polluted their water supplies with massive mining operations. Starting in the 1890s, westerners successfully lobbied for federal agencies to manage the public lands. By the 1950s, after prioritizing extractive uses for many decades, the public pressed Congress to enact a series of environmental laws to steer these agencies toward sound and sustainable land stewardship. Under these new laws, and the regulations developed to implement them, agencies were required to manage most public lands under a “multiple use” mandate that includes wildlife habitat, watersheds, historical features, and public recreation among the key uses. No longer would the almighty dollar rule the public lands, at least in theory. Agencies were granted the option (but not the obligation) to lease public lands for livestock grazing, to lease underground minerals for oil and gas extraction, and to contract with logging companies to cut down tracts of forest, as long as environmental standards are met. With some exceptions, these same agencies have full legal authority to halt granting these leases and sales of public resources at any time, for any reason. In reality, federal public lands are managed in trust by federal agencies for the landowners – all Americans – and with that responsibility comes the obligation to put the public interest writ large ahead of the profit interests of any one corporation or industrial sector.

10) Local control would result in better management of western public lands

Every time there is an election, you’ll hear more and more of these dishonest statements baked into the talking points of politicians hoping to sway enough votes to get elected. But this Big Lie isn’t told exclusively during limited to election season. It can be heard year-round from corporate lobbyists, county commissioners, Cliven Bundy and his ragtag band of armed militants, and sometimes even from well-intentioned conservationists who don’t know any better. But for the past century and a half, state and local governments have controlled the development of private land and the management of wildlife populations. If states and counties were so great at land stewardship, why is there urban sprawl in rural areas? Why are there so many endangered species? And when you look at the water and air pollution that dominated America in the 1950s and 1960s, it took federal laws and regulation to clean up the problem, after state and local governments failed to address the poisoning of their own residents. The fact of the matter is that state and local governments, due to their smaller size, are easier targets for big money interests and big polluting corporations to bully into submission. Many state governments have been captured by the industries that exploit public lands for their own private gain, and cannot be trusted to own or manage federal public lands.

Deconstructing the Big Lies

It would be easy to conclude that if you catch a politician, a community leader, or anyone else repeating one of these Big Lies, that makes them a liar. While that’s often true, it’s not always so simple. There are plenty of people out there who aren’t in a position to know any better, but are vocal with their opinions nonetheless. Repetition is the way the big lies are adopted as truths: Tell the same falsehood 26 times, according to advertising industry research, and the audience will accept it as common knowledge. Beware the Big Lie in western political discourse. Everyone in the West – and every owner of western public lands (in effect, each American citizen) – should do their part to bring daylight to these falsehoods and to ensure that political decisions that affect us all are driven by realities rather than distortions. 

More articles by:

Erik Molvar is a wildlife biologist and is the Laramie, Wyoming-based Executive Director of Western Watersheds Project, a nonprofit group dedicated to protecting and restoring watersheds and wildlife on western public lands.

14 replies »

  1. Well stated, and hopefully will be widely circulated — as fast as a wildfire!

    I’d only add this obsrvation about fires. The vast airborne pollen clouds shaken loose by the wind are also incendiary, so in extreme heat these become flying embers that can fly well beyond a quarter mile. Carving more roads and “greenspaces” into forested areas will not stop these but will provide more and more avenues for people to turn them into permanent trails, with related risks of more fires, as well as the nonstop introduction of waste and trash.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. One of the recent most comprehensive articles written and by a person well informed about these issues.
    I agree with Icy … spread this far and wide.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. This is the happy little email I just got!!
    THIS time they arent going to spay pregnant mares!!! Thats the difference. Has anyone else heard about this?

    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Burns District Office, has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOI-BLM-ORWA-B050-2019-0013-EA) and an unsigned finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the Spay Feasibility and On-Range Outcomes Environmental Assessment. The EA, unsigned FONSI, and EA appendices are available for your review at BLM’s ePlanning website:

    https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/nepa/nepa_register.do.

    To search for this project on the ePlanning website, you can either use the map to locate Burns District, Oregon or click on the “Text Search” tab and select:

    State: Oregon/Washington

    Office: ORWA – Three Rivers FO

    Document Type: EA

    Fiscal Year: 2019

    Program: Wild Horses and Burros

    The documents can also be found at the direct link to the project page:

    https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=dispatchToPatternPage&currentPageId=184356

    Like

    • Bet they will spay pregnant mares anyways, who will stop them? How sad our country is trying to put women in jail who don’t even know they are pregnant if they abort or miscarry, yet are more than happy to tear out mare’s fetuses without remorse, shame, or accountability.

      I encourage everyone to read the words of Pope Francis’ encyclical on “care for our common home” in which he reminds us all that the gifts we inherited must be carefully and lovingly stewarded. Anything less cannot be considered Christian.

      I also must protest the “no significant impact” categorization, since if you were one of those mares or fetuses, it would have the most significance imaginable. And further, if there is literally “no significant impact” to the environment of these barbaric and dehumanizing practices, what then is the possible justification for spilling the blood of so many innocents, innocents our nation of laws swore to protect.

      May a herd of nightmares curse them all their days if they follow through with this, in our names (and His).

      Like

  4. This is perhaps the most poignant contrast in how our country has fallen into darkness so deep… a significant impact of blind cruelty and greed.

    An excerpt from the great speech of Chief Seattle (Si`ahl) :

    “Every part of the earth is sacred to my people.
    Every shining pine needle, every sandy shore,
    Every mist in the dark woods, every meadow,
    Every humming insect.

    All are holy in the memory and experience of my people.

    We know the sap that courses through the trees
    As we know the blood that courses through our veins.

    We are a part of the earth and it is a part of us.
    The perfumed flowers, the bear, the deer, the great eagle,
    The rocky crests, the dew in the meadow,
    The body heat of the pony, and man.

    All belong to the same family.

    This we know, the earth does not belong to man,
    Man belongs to the earth.

    All things are connected. Like the blood that unites us all.
    Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.
    Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

    Liked by 1 person

  5. We truly are ALL in the same battle

    OREGON AND COLORADO PIPELINE OPPONENTS JOIN FORCES
    Pipeline foes: ‘We’re all in the same fight’
    Southern Oregon opponents of a proposed natural gas pipeline and export facility have joined forces with Colorado drilling opponents in their battle against the project.
    “We’re all in the same fight,” said Colorado activist Pete Kolbenschlag, part of a contingent of local and Colorado residents touring areas that would be affected by the project.
    Kolbenschlag said drilling in Colorado has impacted rural areas, including farms and vineyards, and is now encroaching on urban areas, bringing odors, noise, unsightly drilling infrastructure and environmental impacts.
    The proposed 229-mile pipeline through southwest Oregon would tap into existing inland pipe networks, providing a path for Canadian and American natural gas to reach a proposed export terminal on the coast at Jordan Cove north of Coos Bay. The natural gas would be shipped overseas, primarily to Asia.
    Building the pipeline and export terminal would increase demand for Colorado natural gas, triggering more drilling in that state, Kolbenschlag said.
    He said Colorado and Oregon residents need to understand they all will be impacted.
    “When we start to think how we’re connected, it gives us strength,” he said.
    https://mailtribune.com/news/top-stories/oregon-colorado-gas-pipeline-opponents-join-forces

    Like

  6. You will see at the base of this article that PG&E is the biggest shipper on the Ruby Pipeline

    PG&E’S BANKRUPTCY SPELLING TROUBLE FOR RUBY?
    January 29th, 2019 | Connor McLean

    n January 14, 2019, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) announced it would file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. California’s largest utility faces nearly $30 billion in potential liabilities stemming from wildfires in 2017 and 2018. As the company prepares to restructure, some 16 million California customers are preparing to deal with the fallout. However, they’re not the only ones as Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KM) and Pembina’s (TSX: PPL) Ruby Pipeline serves as a major supply route to the west coast, and PG&E is the largest capacity holder on Ruby Pipeline. The pending bankruptcy combined with delays in west coast LNG exports could leave Ruby Pipeline facing a shortage of potential shippers as existing contracts expire.

    The Ruby Pipeline stretches 680 miles across Wyoming, Nevada, and Oregon. Additionally, the Ruby Pipeline provides 1.5 Bcf/d of capacity out of the Rockies to meet demand on the West Coast. The pipe terminates in Malin, OR, where it connects with PG&E’s California Gas Transmission line to serve demand in Northern California. It comes as no surprise, then, that PG&E is the largest shipper on Ruby pipeline with one contract serving its electric generation load and one for its gas distribution arm. In total, PG&E has about 0.4 Bcf/d of take-or-pay arrangements that expire in 2026. This represents approximately 35% of Ruby’s currently contracted volumes, and 25% of total capacity as illustrated in the chart below. The remaining 65% is predominantly held by western Rockies E&P companies with most commitments expiring in 2021.

    https://btuanalytics.com/ruby-pipeline-capacity-gap/

    Liked by 1 person

  7. And sure enough…there’s BLM …again.
    How much of this pipeline would cut through some of Oregon’s HMA and/or Wild Horse Territories?

    PACIFIC CONNECTOR GAS PIPELINE

    The proposed Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline is a 235-mile, 36-inch-diameter high-pressure natural gas transmission line that would traverse the state of Oregon. If constructed, the pipeline would have the capacity to move approximately one billion cubic feet of natural gas per day.
    Approximately 41 miles of the project would cross BLM public lands and approximately 30 miles of the project would cross national forest system lands managed by three national forests.
    The proposed PCGP would link existing natural gas transmission lines in Malin, Oregon with the Jordan Cove Energy Project (JCEP), a proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility in Coos Bay, Oregon. Natural gas transported to the Jordan Cove facility would be liquefied and exported.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is the lead federal agency that authorizes the siting, construction, and operation of interstate natural gas pipelines and LNG terminals under the provisions of the Natural Gas Act. The proposed LNG facility and pipeline are a major infrastructure projects requiring a variety of authorizations and permits for other federal, state and local agencies.
    BLM is a cooperating agency in the FERC process because BLM has authority under the Mineral Leasing Act to issue ROW grants for natural gas pipelines crossing federal lands. The U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Reclamation must concur with the right-of-way and are also cooperating agencies. The actions of these agencies are analyzed in the Draft EIS.

    https://www.blm.gov/oregon-washington/energy-independence/pacific-connector

    Like

  8. David Bernhardt and the BLM have announced their official intent to privatize our federal wildlands with no disguise this week… it’s blatant and unbelievable.
    The Huffington Post has reported that the heretofore “mission statement” of BLM :
    “…..to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of America’s public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.”
    has been cut out from all agency releases including those that predate the Trump administration.

    It has been replaced with:
    “… diverse activities authorized on these lands generated $96 billion in ‘sales of goods and services’ in fiscal year 2017.”
    The change of statement first appearing this week on a COAL MINING LEASE in Oklahoma.

    These ‘billions’ were the estimated revenue MADE by all the companies that TOOK from our federal lands, undoubtedly old cronies and connections of Bernhardt (the former DOI puppet mastermind behind Zinke).

    Do our Wild Ones stand a chance of surviving this insane corruption? I am beyond astounded that they think that the American public is this apathetic, and that they are above the law. It is pure evil.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. EXCLUSIVE: TWO TOP TRUMP OFFICIALS ARE EX-LOBBYISTS FOR A BILLIONAIRE WITH DEEP TIES TO RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS
    By Greg Walters

    Two senior Trump administration officials were once registered as lobbyists for an investment company controlled by a Soviet-born industrialist who made billions doing business with newly sanctioned Russian oligarchs.
    Makan Delrahim is now the assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division in the Department of Justice, after rising from his original appointment as deputy White House counsel and deputy assistant to the president.

    DAVID BERNHARDT is the No. 2 official in Trump’s Department of the Interior.
    Both men registered as lobbyists in 2011 and 2012 for Access Industries, a holding company controlled by billionaire Leonard Blavatnik, according to public filings reviewed by VICE News.
    https://news.vice.com/en_ca/article/d35kgw/two-top-trump-officials-are-ex-lobbyists-for-a-billionaire-with-deep-ties-to-russian-oligarchs

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Does it make you wonder why this isn’t being investigated by our House Oversight Committee right up there with all the other major crimes of the Trump mafioso???
    Why isn’t the fate of our wildlands and our precious wildlife species (and our irreplaceable Wild Horses!) just as important to this country as a treasonous political takeover based on the criminal and destructive ?
    Who the hell is fighting in Congress for the futures of all that we hold sacred? I doubt that Pelosi’s “strategy” is addressing the BLM or Bernhardt issue.
    My blood is boiling over this… it is truly the eleventh (& a half) hour!!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Deborah Rainwater Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.